Imagine living in a world where the more you earn, the less tax you pay. Sounds too good to be true, right? Basically, in some systems, this is what degressive taxation would mean: Here the tax rate actually falls with your income going up.
While this sounds absolutely counterintuitive, it has generated much debate and discussion about what is equitable in economics, and about what the future of taxation may hold.
Want to know how it works and whether it might be the answer to all our tax system problems? Let’s take a deeper look!
What is Degressive Taxation
Degressive taxation refers to a tax system in which the tax rate decreases as the taxable amount (such as income or wealth) increases.
In other words, higher earners or larger amounts of taxable income are taxed at a lower percentage compared to those with lower incomes or smaller amounts of wealth.
This system works in the opposite direction from progressive taxation, which sees tax rates increase as the taxable amount increases.
Degressive taxation has its system of design, easing the tax burden on a wealthier individual or entity as their incomes and wealth grow, and it is less common than progressive tax systems.
Historical Context
Degressive taxation has been in force since time immemorial. In many countries, often to encourage economic growth, investment, or business expansion by offering lower tax burdens to wealthier individuals and companies.
Origin and Development
The idea of degressive taxation came up in the 19th and early 20th centuries when the industrialized countries were about to rapidly expand their economic bases.
Early forms were often directed at encouraging business investment, giving tax cuts to larger businesses or wealthier individuals on the grounds that reducing their tax burden would have wider economic benefits.
Over time, it has evolved into a more formalized structure in many European countries, balancing the use of tax incentives with revenue generation.
Countries That Have Used Degressive Taxation
Degressive taxation has been in force in many different countries, often in certain contexts or for certain sectors of the economy. Examples include:
- Germany: In certain periods, Germany used degressive tax rates, especially in its system of corporate taxation, to stimulate investment by businesses and economic growth. The system was applied to businesses with the view to stimulating industrial growth.
- France: In some instances, France applies the degressive tax principles in corporate and inheritance taxes, especially for investments to stimulate and develop certain economic sectors.
- United States: While this is not the common structure, degressive taxation principles have occasionally been employed in relation to particular circumstances. This occurred, for example, in the year 1980, when President Reagan implemented the degressive model as part of the stimulation package designed to drive growth by reducing tax burdens imposed on high-income earners and corporations.
- Italy: Italy has enforced various kinds of degressive tax systems for certain business sectors ever since WWII to encourage entrepreneurship, support local industries in their growth.
Advantages of Degressive Taxation
Advantages of Depressive Taxation
The following are the major advantages of Degressive taxation concept:
- Encouraging Investment: Low taxes on bigger profits eventually encourage and motivate businesses to reinvest for more growth.
- Boosts Economic Growth: Greater disposable income increases demand and spending.
- Growth of Business: It decreases the tax burden on businesses to expand their horizons.
- Encourages Entrepreneurship: It encourages new business with less initial tax rate.
- Simplifies Tax Administration: Fewer tax brackets make the entire system less cumbersome to administer.
Criticisms and Disadvantages
Let’s take a look at some of the drawbacks in using this system.
- Increases Inequality: It increases the wealth of the rich, further developing the gap between them and the poor.
- Reduces Government Revenue: Lower taxation in higher income classes reduces money for public services.
- Encourages Tax Avoidance: Richer people and businesses may dodge taxes.
- Lacking Social Benefit: It may not raise enough money to spend on social programs that help poorer people.
Comparison with Other Tax Systems
Degressive taxation works in a manner that is fully opposite to both progressive and flat taxes mechanisms.
While the former increases in line with income growth, and the latter is uniform, degressive tax offers a tax rate that is low for high-income earners to promote investment and business activities.
Progressive Taxation
In a progressive tax system, the taxes imposed on the individuals increase when the level of their income increases. The more an individual earns, the more percentage of his or her income has to be paid in the form of taxes.
Progressive taxation, therefore, does not necessarily favor the rich; it aims to reduce inequality by placing a greater share of the tax burden on the well-off.
Flat Tax
A flat tax system imposes the same tax rate upon each and every level of income. Unlike in degressive taxation, where tax rates decrease with higher earnings, flat taxes treat everyone equally, which can be simpler but may not address income inequality.
Real-World Applications
Degressive taxation has been used by various countries to promote investment, enterprise, and expansion with the aim of achieving economic growth. This section examines how different nations have actually implemented this tax regime.
- Corporate Taxation: Here some countries apply degressive tax rates to businesses and, as a rule, provide lower rates of taxation as the profits increase with the motive of encouraging investment and expansion.
- Germany: The German degressive taxation has been applied for business investments by providing low rates on large businesses with an economic growth factor.
- France: In France, degressive tax rates apply to inheritance and corporate taxes; degressive taxes have been employed in some industries to encourage corporate investment.
- United States: Under the regime of the Reagan administration, degressive tax cuts were imposed in the United States to spur corporate growth and economic expansion.
Conclusion
In a nutshell, degressive tax rates favor investment and economic growth but also include some negative factors like increasing inequality. Trying to apply degressive taxation in different countries, the success would be based on the economic situation and the objective.